Snake oil 2.0 image credit to Hugh MacLeod
Another "SEO as Snake Oil" Blog Post
I read the umpteenth blog post last week that claimed that SEO was “snake oil”. The thing that struck me is that calling something a scam or snake oil for the sake of attention is the *real* snake oil.
First off here is the post: http://societrends.com/2009/05/07/seo-is-todays-snake-oil/.
I’ll start by saying I think a lot of the rampant hyperbole and apparent misunderstanding here comes from a misconception about the term “SEO”. I suspect a lot of activities I’d consider “SEO” related would be things the poster would just call “marketing” or use another term for. Regardless I think there are some opinions in this post that aren’t entirely unique to the poster, and so worth calling out.
Either way, here are some excerpts from the piece that I found particularly troublesome:
“One way I know SEO “experts,” strategists and consultants are selling you bumpkis is because no one, unless they currently write algorithms for Google or Yahoo, knows exactly what you need to do in order to be indexed and highly ranked by search engines. And probably not even a single of these engineers has every piece of the magical puzzle.”
This is sort of like saying that a poker player can’t create a statistical advantage for herself because she doesn’t know which cards will be dealt, or like accusing a pilot who couldn’t single-handedly assemble a plane of being no better qualified to fly one than you or I. One doesn’t need to “know the whole algorithm” to be able to observe tactics and best practices that increase their or their clients’ chances of achieving higher rankings.
A second quote:
“Another way I know is because I’ve had as much success with SEO as “experts,” and it’s not because I possess some special power. It’s because anyone with some concept of the Internet who can read, can figure out how to boost their ranking.”
I think this is a bit insulting to the legions of very bright people with poorly optimized sites, but either way, your being able to do something doesn’t render it without value. A CEO might be perfectly able to do a number of menial jobs and even some skilled ones within his company, but he hires specialists because there are so many hours in the day, and different people are better and worse suited for different things.
”Also, do you realize many developers/programmers snicker when they hear SEO “expert?” These folks know what’s up. (A lot of marketers do, too, cause they know a health elixir when they see one.)
Still another way I know SEO “experts” are selling you snake oil is because I’ve worked with them before, and I’ve had them tell me how they do what they do.”
This is obviously an extremely hyperbolic blanket statement; although it may of course be true amongst the people you’ve surrounded yourself with, who share your biases.
Finally, from the closing:
“SEO “experts” use publicly available online sources to know how to boost a page’s rank. In other words, they read the same things you can read to try and boost a page’s rank. They go to pages like this and this. They read them, they take notes, which they then repackage as a “formula for success” and then sell to you as their services.
If you’ve paid an SEO “expert,” you’ve essentially paid for them to do research you could do and manage site linking and code plugging that you could do.
Too busy to deal with SEO?
Hire an intern.”
Not unlike any profession, most reputable SEOs have:
- Studied the subject
- Practiced the subject
- Iterated and built on the things they’ve learned
- Produced consistent, documentable results.
I could get a high school student to visit a few how-to sites and have him or her knowing something about how a car works at the end of it. But they wouldn’t be nearly as effective or efficient as a veteran mechanic. When complex problems arose, they would be completely at a loss. Much as I suspect the author would be if I put you in charge of the SEO for a large website with hundreds of thousands of pages of content that drives millions of uniques a month and needs to maintain rankings for a broad portfolio of keywords to drive profits.
SEO requires you to:
- Generate interest and links to your Website.
- Create content that is easy to understand (so easy to understand, in fact, that you have to shape your content to the way people think about, talk about, and search for it!).
- And design a site with an intelligent information architecture so that content is easily and logically accessible to searchers and search engines
Take a look at the list of things we believe. There’s no snake oil there. There’s nothing shifty or “quick” about continuous and iterative activities to promote your product and your content while trying to align the things you write with the way your audience talks and types. These are all functions of marketing that anyone interested in selling anything will religiously adhere to.
Before we cast aspersions about entire professions, it’s always good to dig deeper and to find out how these jobs typically function and who the majority of practitioners are. Otherwise, you’re the one broadcasting misinterpretations and pedaling misinformation as fact.