New social media polling data suggests Republican Scott Brown will trounce Democrat Martha Coakley in US Senate Race

By Larry Kim January 14, 2010 Comments: 69

If you like this post, please bookmark it on Delicious for future reference, or Digg it.

Social Media Polling:

The state-wide special election to fill the seat vacated by US Senator Edward Kennedy on January 19th has attracted huge national interest because if the Democrats lose this seat, they lose the filibuster-proof margin they currently have in the US Senate.

For the first time for as long I can remember, my very own home state of Massachusetts is today considered a battleground state. Recent polls show the two candidates, State Senator Scott Brown (Republican) and State Attorney General Martha Coakley (Democrat) engaged in a tight race – well within the margin of error.

 DatesScott Brown (R)Martha Coakley (D)
Public Policy Polling (PPP)January 7-948%47%
Rasmussen ReportsJanuary 1147%49%

But being a search marketer, I launched my own investigation to see if I could find out more information about the dynamics of this US Senate race based on internet marketing and social media metrics. The findings (based on data collected on January 14) were staggering. The data suggests that conventional pollsters and Washington insiders have it completely wrong – that it won't be a tight race, and that State Senator Scott Brown will win by a landslide.

Social Media Polling Methodology

In this poll I looked at the three major social media venues – Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube – as well as the Alexa Ratings. I used the user engagement metrics that are available from the various sites in order to compare the internet presence of the two candidates.

YouTube Channels

Both candidates prominently feature a link to their respective YouTube channels on their home pages and syndicate television ads and other content on the site. Scott Brown is showing a 10:1 advantage over Martha Coakley in terms of video content viewership.

 Channel ViewsTotal Upload ViewsSubscribers
Martha Coakley on YouTube8,56124,01458
Scott Brown on YouTube26,622223,678387

Facebook Fan Pages

Facebook fan pages are a great way to connect with people and their networks. Both Scott Brown and Martha Coakley maintain their own Facebook fan pages, which are featured prominently on their homepages. Scott Brown has over a 4:1 edge in terms of number of fans.

 Number of Fans
Martha Coakley Fan Page9,398
Scott Brown Fan Page41,050

Twitter Mentions

President Obama famously used Twitter to connect to millions of followers. Both Scott Brown and Martha Coakley employ Twitter to communicate with their fans – again, Scott Brown has the edge. He has more followers, appears on more user lists, and generates more buzz overall on Twitter.

 FollowersListedTwitter Mentions
Martha Coakley on Twitter26742367210
Scott Brown on Twitter710540421500

Alexa Rankings

Alexa is an internet ratings company – think "Nielson's ratings for the internet". If the point of all the social media efforts on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter is to familiarize people with your brand and drive engagement to your website, and if Scott Brown is doing a better job than Martha Coakley in all the aforementioned social media marketing tactics, you'd expect to see more traffic to his website. And indeed we see that Scott Brown has a tenfold advantage in internet reach (i.e., an estimate of the percentage of internet users that visit their respective websites on any given day). Also noteworthy is rate at which Scott Brown has skyrocketed - in just a week – any conventional pollster will tell you that momentum is everything.

Scott Brown versus Martha Coakley

So in summary, Scott Brown is way ahead in this race, with the following numbers:

  • 10:1 Advantage in YouTube video views
  • 4:1 Advantage in Facebook fans
  • 3:1 Advantage in Twitter mentions
  • 10:1 Advantage in estimated web traffic

Is this Polling Data Valid? Can Social Media Metrics Predict Election Outcomes?

First of all, consider that conventional polling is flawed – they go through the phone book, so they exclude anyone without a land line. This social media polling data also excludes people – namely, those who don't use social media or the web. The question is, who is the more "likely voter", someone with a land line or someone who uses Facebook? I have no idea. I do know this: one day, more people will use social media than land lines - maybe not today, but probably not too far off either.

The social media polling data could simply mean that Scott Brown supporters are more excited about their candidate than Martha Coakley supporters – and even the conventional polling data has picked up on that notion. Clearly underdogs have the most passionate fan base (think crazy RedSox fans pre-2004).

Then there's the effect of non-Massachusetts residents (who can't vote in this election) affecting the social media engagement metrics – though as far as I can tell, the Senate race has attracted the attention of national special interest groups on both sides of the political spectrum. But are non-Massachusetts special interest groups and their followers 3 to 10 times more likely to be interested in Scott Brown than Martha Coakley?

It could be that the average Coakley supporter doesn't use the internet or social media venues as much as the average Scott Brown supporter. Again: is it plausible that her supporters use social media 3 to 10 times less?

It's also noteworthy to point out that in November 2008, Alexa had Barack Obama with an estimated five times larger Web presence over John McCain – and President Obama was famous for his success in connecting with the electorate over Twitter, YouTube and Facebook – and he won that election in a landslide.

In summary, while the data might not be complete, all available signs in the Social Media sphere currently point to a pretty strongly to a win by Scott Brown next week.

What are your thoughts? Post them in the comment fields below.

Search marketing guideDownload a FREE Internet marketing best practices white paper

Hit me up on Twitter




Related Posts

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment.

Comments

Thursday January 14, 2010

Tom Crandall (not verified) Said:

Larry,

This is excellent data but not exclusive to Massachusett(e)s, as you stated. While there is desperation on both sides of the political spectrum I believe a lot of this traffic is the result of an energized conservative base, largely out-of-state. I would be shocked if Martha Coakley didn't win by five-plus points.

Friday January 15, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

Thanks Tom. I think that is one of the most surprising aspects of this social media survey data - that there seems to be a disconnect between what the political pundits/polls are saying/believing and what is actually happening in the social media sphere - that social media indicators point to the race not being close at all.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Richard (not verified) Said:

Social Media as Predictor of Outcome? Maybe

Larry, as I read your blog I kept asking myself, "Will Larry mention the non-Massachusetts factor in social media?". And of course you did.

For Twitter, Facebook, and Alexa, I don't know of any feature they have for showing Massachusetts only Twitter followers, Facebook friends, or website traffic. So no one knows for sure how much "Massachusetts only" social media traction one candidate has over another.

But it's fun to speculate on Massachusetts Jan 19 senatorial election.

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

The data may not be only from Mass. but it shows a good cross section. I would say this is good data. How would the web use in Mass. be any different than the rest of the country. If this is how America view it than this is probably how Mass. rolls.

Thursday January 14, 2010

DanM (not verified) Said:

I have always been interested in using search and social media data to forecast events like elections. A couple other analysis points that could be interesting:

- Twitter & Youtube/Facebook content analysis (i.e. Is Scott Brown getting a lot of mentions online that are favorable or negative?)
- Geo-targeted PPC Campaign - If you did a geotargeted PPC campaign just for MA visitors on their names and looked at impressions you could get a feel for the out of state influence.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

If i was a online marketing manager for a political candidate in a state election, i would run ads on both my candidate's name and the challenger's name. I would organize the account so that i had at least 2 campaigns - one geo-targeted campaign for in-state, and another geo-targeted for the rest of the country. By looking at the in-state impression and click data for my candidate versus the challenger, i could get a sense of how the race was trending over time.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Scott W. Somerville (not verified) Said:

All this would be largely irrelevant if it didn't match up to yard signs on the ground in Massachusetts and comments to articles in the Massachusetts papers. The on-the-ground metrics are pretty much the same as the Twitter/Facebook stats you mention here. Yard signs for Brown all over the place--they've run out and then run out again. People are actually stealing Brown signs--not to destroy them (which happens all too often) but because one Brown supporter lives on a busier street than another!

The last time I saw this kind of enthusiasm was after the Red Sox won game 4 against the Yankees in 2004. It could happen again!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

I am an out of state volunteer and am thrilled that the yard sign is working so well. Your comment is full of encourage for all of us everywhere! Go Brown Brigadiers!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

funny you mentioned the red sox - in my article, i wrote that i thought that: "underdogs have the most passionate fan base (think crazy RedSox fans pre-2004)."  :P

Thursday January 14, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

I was finally able to get a Brown yard sign today. In the five minutes we were outside placing it, almost every driver passing (at least a dozen)honked and gave a thumbs up or wave in support. I have been on the Scott Brown fan page on facebook for months. When I joined its membership was at about 4-5,000. As of Tuesday, it was 30,000. Right now he is at over 46,000. If that doesn't show momentum, I don't know what does!

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

Where did you get the sign??? I want two!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

The result will depend entirely on turnout. If highly motivated unenrolled voters turnout heavily for Brown, the Dems enrollment advantage evaporates. All polls show unenrolled voters favoring Brown in variably large degrees.

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

MANY registered MA DEMS are NOT voting for Coakley, so how does that number fit into the equation?

Thursday January 14, 2010

Jon Strabala (not verified) Said:

I just love to see this type of creative thinking - applying new tech to real world situations.

Fascinating concept, why don't you go back in time and analyze Doug Hoffman NY 23 Congressional district run and then look at the real outcome and build a "model" with corrections.
Who knows by applying a bit of correlation, you might be able to create the new "polling" of the next century.

Regards
Jon Strabala

Thursday January 14, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

Thanks Jon - my sense is that there has to be some meaning that can be extrapolated from all these social media engagement statistics - after all, isn't that the point of an election -- to try to generate buzz and enthusiasm for your candidate and their ideas which somehow translates into voter turnout? I'm not sure how exactly buzz translates to votes, but i'm clearly seeing a lot of buzz in the social media sphere.

Thursday January 14, 2010

jim (not verified) Said:

Does anyone else see this potentially gaping flaw in the data: the elderly, many of whom don't view YouTube, don't have Facebook pages and don't Tweet. Some don't even have computers (my mother-in-law). One thing the elderly DO traditionally do, is vote. And in Massachusetts they overwhelmingly vote Democratic. Still, on the ground, there is no doubt that the Brown campaign is a sensation. What's refreshing is that every Brown supporter I've run in to (and I've run into a LOT of Brown supporters this week)are passionately driven by issues, especially health care -- not Brown's good looks or his family or the fact he's a Republican. As for my computer-less mother-in-law? She's got bursitis and has trouble walking. But come Tuesday she says she will hobble over to her polling place and cast a vote for... Brown.

Saturday January 16, 2010

supporter from Califonia (not verified) Said:

Remember that older voters are also aware of what a trashing they are going to get with Obama-care, and will vote Brown in their best interests. I have never been involved in politics until now and sent Brown $25--hope it bought a bunch of yard signs.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

All a conservative from PA like me can hope for is that Scott Brown wins. There are few of my friends in in this little so central PA town who have sent money to his campaign. We all know what is at stake here... the little freedoms that we still have stay in tact and take our country back. To hell with political correctness and the whole lot!

Thursday January 14, 2010

BFFG (not verified) Said:

The enthusiasm in Mass is great for Brown. People like his authentic approach. If you saw the interview that Hannity did with him and tryed to get him to label himself as a "Regan Conservative" Brown wouldn't bite. He has been very intelligent and authentic in his approach. It is like a return the the idealism of what politics is supposed to be about. Martha has gone negative, moved away from her record and begun to personally attack Brown. Brown is not a typical republican he is his own man, his own approach his own convictions. The independents like me definitely are flocking to him because it is refreshing and not more of the same BS.

What is revealing to me from all of the commentary above is the enthusiasm. I drove from Portsmouth New Hampshire today to the south shore and I saw two separate vehicles that had basically painted scott Brown for Senate on their windows. It's like "Class of 2010" for graudating seniors. It looks to me like a 5 to 7 point victory for Brown.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Hiawatha W (not verified) Said:

I'd like to come back after the election and see how accurate your prediction is.

Another factor I consider is the quality of each candidate's internet presence. Scott Brown's website has energizing youtube videos on the main page, while Martha Coakley's is very old-school, difficult to search, and somewhat boring.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

You're right - Coakley's content might not be as engaging as Brown's, and that could potentially result in lower social media engagement numbers. And I suspect the fact that Brown is featuring his daughters (including former American Idol star, Ayla Brown) in many of the YouTube videos isn't hurting his social media engagement numbers either.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Hiawatha W (not verified) Said:

Very interesting idea. Scott Brown is certainly generating more buzz - sometimes (as in the case of Obama) that's an accurate predictor of results. But other times (like with 3rd party candidates) it isn't and the final tally can be very small. I'd like to come back after the election and see how accurate your prediction is.

Another factor I consider is the quality of each candidate's internet presence. Scott Brown's website has energizing youtube videos on the main page, while Martha Coakley's is very old-school, difficult to search, and somewhat boring. If she loses it's really her own fault.

Thursday January 14, 2010

Larry Kim Said:

Indeed- often the smallest dogs have the loudest bark. We'll find out what's going on soon enough next week!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Gabriel (not verified) Said:

Everything point to a political change in the wind for Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown, with only 5 days left, the word is spreading and the Independent voters are making the switch to the Republican party, they will help Scott carry the state, for the first time in over forty years, there will finally be a two party representation for the citizen of Massachusetts.

While the win is not concrete, the last few months of the Obama administration, its back-room deals to shove these new so-called "social-responsible agenda's" on the backs of unemployed Americans is OVER! As a preacher once said "the chickens have come to roost" The answer to the changing face of politics is Scott Brown, a fresh look at a party with much to do to gain the respect and trust of the American people. But, it will take time, it will happen in the coming months, with the mid-term elections, key members of the Obama team will find themselves out of a job, having to work for a living, the the rest of us. The re is an opportunity for change, and next Tuesday - Scott Brown will forever change the face of Massachusetts politics and that of this American Nation, for it is "for the people, by the people", that we shall prevail. Send the message loud and clear - "Can you hear me now?"

Vote for change, vote for the future of this great Nation!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Media policy claims Scott Brown(R-MA) will win in landslide (not verified) Said:

[...] Wordstream. A media polling org who suggests that Scot Brown(R-MA) will win a a landslide. Poll: Scott Brown to Win Massachusetts US Senate Race by a Landslide | WordStream It appears Scott gets more views than Coakley, period and outnumbers 1 to 10 on youtube. And was [...]

Thursday January 14, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

most of the people that think coakley is gonna win by alot or at all are probably not in the state of mass every three houses in my town has a scott brown sign in front of it i have yet to see a martha coakley sign.

Friday January 15, 2010

Tom (not verified) Said:

That is so awesome! I hope he wins. The people of Massachusetts can bring freedom back to our country. I hope the state I live in, New York, follows suit with our two Senators. God bless Massachusetts!

Thursday January 14, 2010

Debbe Makowski (not verified) Said:

The seat Ted Kennedy held should have been changed many years ago, I am all for term limits. This is not his seat, it is the seat belonging to the people. Our country needs new ideas, change is good, especially in politics where politicians become too comfortable and corrupt. Voting results of our politicians is the only way to bring about laws, policies, rules, regulations, programs, etc. BUYING, BRIBING, PAYING OFF, for a politcians vote makes my stomach turn. This current administration is the most corrupt (CHICAGO POLITICS) and we MUST vote them ALL out in order to save our future and for the safety of our citizens! You go Mr. Brown, you have my vote!

Friday January 15, 2010

Fred Anderson (not verified) Said:

My local Democratic rep. in the U.S. House, who has a background in health care, has asked some intelligent questions about some aspects of the proposed health care bill. For this the Party faithful seem to have organized a belligerent campaign to destroy him. Our representatives should be responsive to us, not to the Party bosses. The thuggish actions by the Democratic Party against my representative, say that these people are unfit to govern us. Ms. Coakley may be a fine person, but the bosses will not allow her to speak honestly for our interests. If we want representation, we have no choice but to vote for somebody else. (Chatham homeowner)

Friday January 15, 2010

LaToya Washington (not verified) Said:

Speaking of campaigns: I will raise $2 million dollars for Governor Sarah Palin if she runs for the White House and I hope you will join me in doing all you can to eject this current disgrace and obvious failure from the Oval Office as soon as we can.

Friday January 15, 2010

RoBoTech (not verified) Said:

"Does anyone else see this potentially gaping flaw in the data: the elderly"

Well, you may be right. BUT, I AM elderly and live in Mass. MOST of the people I know are elderly (58 +). I only know two ladies that will vote for Coakley. MOSt elderly I know are dead against Obabacare and will vote for Brown. And here's another thing. the elderly, VOTE!

Friday January 15, 2010

RoBoTech (not verified) Said:

Oh, and another thing, most Elderly I know use the internet frequently and luv it, and some use SKYPE a lot. We have cell phones, but I don't know much about Twitter.

And another interesting thing, even the Democrats I know will vote for Brown. Besides Obamacare it's that Democrat Mantra, "it's Kennedy's Seat" that is REALLY angering the elderly in my area.
It's NOT Kennedy's seat, it's not the Democrat's seat, it's the people of Mass's seat. I believe Brown said that already in the last debate, and we cheered when he did.

Friday January 15, 2010

Don (not verified) Said:

If these metrics were indicative, Ron Paul would have been the GOP nominee for president.

Saturday January 16, 2010

Marvin Foster (not verified) Said:

Actually, I think that Ron Paul would have made a great president. For one thing, he didn't need to scam us taxpayers to get rich, he already had more money than most of could ever imagine.

I will always believe that he quit his campaign because of threats to his family. And as we all know there are ome very corrupt people in Washington and around the World that would stop at nothing to keep an honest person from being President of our United States.

Friday January 15, 2010

John Connor (not verified) Said:

I think that Mr.Scott Brown is going to win the Election.

John Connor.

Friday January 15, 2010

Massachusetts Senate Race Roundup | The Lonely Conservative (not verified) Said:

[...] Inc. believes Scott Brown is going to win the election by a landslide, based on a study of social media.”The findings were staggering. The data suggests that conventional pollsters and Washington [...]

Friday January 15, 2010

Nicholas Hildyard (not verified) Said:

I found this report to be extremely intuitive. If this data is combined with traditional polling and the obvious fact that there is a strong opposition to the Dem's agenda then Coakley is indeed in trouble. Finally. Somebody may control the insanity, because it certainly won't stop.

Friday January 15, 2010

Dophinsluv (not verified) Said:

According to http://realclearpolitics.com Obama won by 7.3%. Maybe its not a landslide, but it's a healthy margin. The consensus polling was 7.6%, off by 0.3%. In Massachusetts, Obama won by 25.8%. The consensus polling was 21.3%, off by 4.5%.

Friday January 15, 2010

Linsey Lansford (not verified) Said:

Where the Obama's and Far left Dems go, Acorn is sure to follow ! According to the word on the ground in Massachusetts, the Dems have ordered Bill Clinton, The kenndys and many other to assist Coakley. And in other reports Acorn may team up with SEIU to of course "GET OUT THE VOTE". I just wonder how many times will the late Ted Kennedy actually cast a vote. This election fraud and vote rigging must be stopped.

Friday January 15, 2010

Holly Wonder (not verified) Said:

I would encourage you to go back and review social media on Doug Hoffman race in NY 23, with poll results. It would also be helpful to partition users of Social Media by State, if you run several past races and correlation the results, I believe you could build a new model.

Very interesting analysis.
H Wonder

Friday January 15, 2010

Henry Knoblock (not verified) Said:

The Social Media is encouraging but the ballot box is the only thing that counts in the end. I have known Scott for 26 years - since law school - he is honest, sincere, extremely hard working and in a phrase "he gets it." The man you see and hear on TV, the radio and You Tube is the guy you will be electing as our next US Senator. Martha Coakley, aka the ice queen, has yet to make her case as to why she should be dog catcher much less a United States Senator. She has yet to run an ad about what she thinks (perhaps the Taliban have snuck back in to Afghanistan since Monday Martha - you could admit you were wrong but then talking about being wrong would mean talking about the botched Louise Woodward case and Fells Acres Day Care). Her attack ads on Scott make claims about Scott which border on fantastic fiction (he is not pro-life and has never been - I know I tried to change his mind). The number of absentee ballots being pulled is a sign in the right direction but everyone from Massachusetts - get out there on Tuesday and vote, send a message to Washington and elect Scott as our next US Senator from Massachusetts.

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

It is time for all conservative MA voters to get out and be poll watchers and make sure that ACORN and SEIU don't load up the votes. VOTERS NEED TO GET INVOLVED WITH THEIR VOTES!

Friday January 15, 2010

avery (not verified) Said:

This is encouraging, but I urge all MA voters to put the pedal to the metal for these last days and Do Not Let Up! Please help your friends and neighbors get to their polling places and be ready to demand Senator Brown is seated promptly! No funny business!

Friday January 15, 2010

avery (not verified) Said:

This is encouraging, but I urge all MA voters to put the pedal to the metal for these last days and Do Not Let Up! Please help your friends and neighbors get to their polling places and be ready to demand Senator Brown is seated promptly! No funny business!

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

I'm not ashamed to say that I have not voted in years and for good reason, in the State of Massachusetts I felt whats the point. It's a Democratic state and the vote will end up as such, year in and year out. Tuesday will be the first time in 14 years that I will make my way to the polls and it isn't because a Republic has a chance. See I'm an independent and I most certainly understand what the consequences of electing an official with little knowledge of not only what's taking place in the Mideast, but also what's going on right here in our country. Her idea of fair and just healthcare is outrageous and I can only pray that enough people in Massachusetts understand just whats at stake. From me and everyone that I know, GO BROWN!!!

Friday January 15, 2010

Rick in NH (not verified) Said:

I live in NH, but I want to move this weekend just to vote in MA for Brown. This is so exciting!

Friday January 15, 2010

Rick in NH (not verified) Said:

Yes! Brown!

Friday January 15, 2010

Dave (not verified) Said:

I hope this is correct but the obvious major flaw is that you don't know if these social media followers are registered Massachusetts voters. They could literally be anywhere in the world. Brown supporters, please don't get complacent. You still need to VOTE.

Friday January 15, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

I am ashamed to say I have never voted in 44 years. BUT! I made it a point this year to register to become a Massachusetts voter!! I am proud to say I will be voting for Scott Brown and praying that God will Spare the state of Massachusetts along with the rest of the world.

Sad as it is Mr.President may have his own agenda for visiting the state of Massachusetts, But God's agenda is GREATER.

I will be praying for the will of God to prevail and I would ask that other christians around the world would pray the same.

Saturday January 16, 2010

Kim Thurman (not verified) Said:

Larry, thank you for a very creative analysis. And thank you Massachusetts for showing the rest of the Nation that WE can come
together regardless of our party affiliation or racial background, do the right thing and vote for the right person. Brown is representative of who we want in Congress. Now we need to just go State by State and clean out dead meat regardless of their party affiliation. We've got your back in Idaho. Go Scott Brown Go!!!!!

Sunday January 17, 2010

Luis Larmonie (not verified) Said:

Hi Americans,

I am from overseas and I like to follow politics closely specialy from the USA. I am very proud from the poeple of the USA and I am shure without any doubt that you, the Americam poeple are the most generous poeple in this world. This Senate election will be historical for your nation, to bring back someone in congress that will bring back the checks and balance on behalf of the POEPLE of the entirs nation. Go for Scott Brown for America.

Saturday January 16, 2010

Californian (not verified) Said:

Haven't seen posts from the "left coast" so here goes---Brown is a light in the darkness to our family. We've felt mounting anger & fear over Obama's agenda & shadow government of Chicago thugs/Czars running rough-shod over the American people...not forgetting party-flunkies bellying up to the trough of public monies. We fear the drudgery of future taxes, & the "dumbing down" of our great American medical care delivery ... throwing in a liberal dose of inequal treatment at the hands of our government in paying for/receiving that care. Likewise, we fear the "dumbing down" of the war on terror that brings those who have declared war against us in word AND deed into our downtown civil courts...right beside hometown thieves, bullies and tax cheats or the like. These things are just for starters, as there are many other troubling items on our minds coming out of the Obama administration that, in former days, would have been topic of HUGE concern in our family, but by comparision, are akin to gnats flying around your head while you are trying to escape the man-eating tiger.

What pains us most about this is that we hoped against hope, like so many others, that Obama meant what he said during his campaign...that there would be "Change You Can Believe In." His actions/inactions wiped that jingo out of existance like yesterday's cold, gooey oatmeal sitting on the countertop awaiting someone to have a "second go" at it. Anyone interested? How much "change" can we stand?

I can't tell you the times that, at our dinner discussions, we've lamented "Who will come out of this darkness to lead?" "Is there one good person ANYWHERE?" Brown appears to be that light. Because of what happened with the vast gap between the Obama campaign and the discharging of his presidential duties, we are very cautious about supporting another who seems charismatic and capable. But for sure---as FORMER DEMOCRATS, we now realize that we didn't necessarily require "Change You Can Believe In" (which left a door wide open for the craziness that is now Washington)....but that we as a people, and we personally, requred "Steadforthness You Can Believe In." We didn't need a rock star, we needed a rock. Lesson learned---the hard way.

Oh Massachusetts, we look to you to save us. Please, please voters, go out and do the right thing by yourselves and for the rest of us in this country who feel as we do---scared, unrepresented, and unheard. Say it for us all and vote for Brown!

Sunday January 17, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

Scott Brown will win in MA by a landslide. The people of MA are not blind and dumb, They stand up for what they believe in which is the best candidate for the job and that happens to be Scott Brown. No one will tell them how to vote. Obama thinks his charm and forceful ways will work. Not this time. He needs to kill the BILL and go on with things he should be concerned about like JOBS, JOBS, JOBS and the ECONOMY. Get to work on what we voted you in for. We the people do not want the Government to make decisions on our Healthcare.

Listen to what we the people want and forget about what you want. We hired you to work for us. The Senate was not put in place to work for the President. They were put in place by the people and should listen to what the people want.
Anonymous

Sunday January 17, 2010

Anonymous (not verified) Said:

Scott Brown will win in MA by a landslide. The people of MA are not blind and dumb, They stand up for what they believe in which is the best candidate for the job and that happens to be Scott Brown. No one will tell them how to vote. Obama thinks his charm and forceful ways will work. Not this time. He needs to kill the BILL and go on with things he should be concerned about like JOBS, JOBS, JOBS and the ECONOMY. Get to work on what we voted you in for. We the people do not want the Government to make decisions on our Healthcare.

Listen to what we the people want and forget about what you want. We hired you to work for us. The Senate was not put in place to work for the President. They were put in place by the people and should listen to what the people want.
Anonymous

Sunday January 17, 2010

SouthpawPatriot (not verified) Said:

Go Scott GO!!!. This shows that Americans are fed up with the way Government has gone and the road they're still on. Americans are tired and want their country and lives back!. Again I say: GO SCOTT GO!!!!!

Sunday January 17, 2010

Chuck (not verified) Said:

This race is not about democrats or republicans, male or female, conservative or liberal, but it is about INTEGRITY. To which I beleive Mr Brown exudes. Go Scott - I'm proud to support you!

Sunday January 17, 2010

Chuck (not verified) Said:

This race is not about democrats or republicans, male or female, conservative or liberal, but it is about INTEGRITY. To which I beleive Mr Brown exudes. Go Scott - I'm proud to support you!

Monday January 18, 2010

GOP internet returns - Techlog (not verified) Said:

[...] and his campaign reportedly went on to raise a million dollars a day throughout the week. The race’s online landscape looks like last November’s in reverse: from YouTube views to Facebook fans to Twitter followers, [...]

Tuesday January 19, 2010

Coakley Brown Senate Race (not verified) Said:

[...] New social media polling data suggests Republican Scott Brown will trounce Democrat Martha Coakley i... (wordstream.com) - January 14, 2010 more Coakley Brown Senate Race delicious links … [...]

Tuesday January 19, 2010

Joe Pemberton (not verified) Said:

Interesting material. Thanks for sharing this.

Is social media an indicator of peoples' leanings? Or is it a way to build awareness and spread ideas?

In pure marketing terms, social media is just a tool people use to filter information coming at them. If info is coming from people's social network, chances are good that it's already somewhat ideologically aligned. The more important aspect is that social media users are letting this past their filters (they're more likely to pay attention) and that adds sticking power when it comes from people they know. From that point of view, I suspect social media in politics is likely better at mobilizing and rallying like-minded people than it is in changing minds. Changing minds and influencing opinion takes ad dollars and good PR.

Tuesday January 19, 2010

Brown Coakley Race (not verified) Said:

[...] New social media polling data suggests Republican Scott Brown will trounce Democrat Martha Coakley i... (wordstream.com) - January 14, 2010 more Brown Coakley Race delicious links … [...]

Tuesday January 19, 2010

Massachusetts Senate Race (not verified) Said:

[...] New social media polling data suggests Republican Scott Brown will trounce Democrat Martha Coakley i... (wordstream.com) - January 14, 2010 [...]

Wednesday January 20, 2010

Darren Pulsipher (not verified) Said:

I think these statistics are a good high level view of what might be going on. But as was mentioned they are very high level. As we found out the results were not as wide margin as the real results, but it was very telling.

Wednesday January 20, 2010

Darren Pulsipher (not verified) Said:

Interesting statistics which I think would be more interesting if they were taken over time. I am sure there will be more statistics like this available in the future.

Thursday January 21, 2010

call me Roy (not verified) Said:

Scott Brown's win isn’t just about the people disliking incumbents. I voted for President Obama (like many Independents) hoping he was a centrist but I was wrong. Like many Americans, I did not do my research on the people who surround this President. Now, I realize that this Administration has many socialists who want to fundamentally change our country by pushing their Progressive agenda down the American people’s throats. The Bush administration was no better, they failed our country miserably by outsourcing all of our jobs (manufacturing) out of America and buy taking care of Wall Street instead of Americans. The mistakes that Obama has made (besides not standing up to China about the currency problem so we can change the trade laws) are piling up and the Democrats in charge of health care need to be tar and feathered. They are worthless and corrupt. We need a health care system created by politicians who work in the open, not behind closed doors. Lastly, we have terrorists who would love to destroy our country and who hate us. What does this administration do? They get them lawyers and band-aids. Does this Administration remember what Al Kaeda does to Americans if they are captured? They are beheaded on video. And we have people who are worried about the terrorist's rights? Our President apologizes to the world about how bad we are, when this country has fed hundreds of millions of people for decades. Our brave and blessed soliders died to save the world from pure evil twice (World War 1 & 2) Then yesterday we finally had lawmakers criticizing leaders of an internal Pentagon inquiry into the deadly Fort Hood shootings for refusing to discuss why the accused gunman moved through the U.S military's ranks despite repeated concerns over his performance and behavior. The American people can easily see how politial correctness has filtered up to the highest levels in our military. Why would anyone turn in this guy knowing if you did, this administration would go after you and courtmartial you for racial profiling. Look at how this administration is prosecuting the Navy Seals for alleged crimes. Just how stupid is this Administration to prosecute 3 Navy Seal heros for giving a terrorist a fat lip when they should have shot and killed the SOB on the spot. There are too many terrorists going to trial and not enough going to Allah! Why is this Administration doing this? Apparently, many people in Massachusetts have made a conscious list of the boneheaded moves by our President dealing with this terrorist problem. The list has become so big, many Americans do not trust our President anymore. This time in history is just like when Woodrow Wilson was in office. The fundamental problem with the Progressives is that they believe they are smarter than those they govern. You can see it in Obama's speeches. He recently said of the health care bill, "The American people will realize that this bill is a good thing...and doesn't do what they say it does." That's more or less saying, "These peasants simply don't understand what we, their great leaders, are trying to do for them." People are upset. People aren't buying what the left is selling, and continuing to try to force this agenda will only serve to hurt them even more. The Progressives always thought they were smarter than the old dumb masses. The American people know when something is wrong. The worst part of this mess is we have three more years of more of the same.

Friday January 22, 2010

Jonathan Groves (not verified) Said:

Interesting analysis. One point to clarify: Many good polling organizations (including Gallup and Pew) do have a method to incorporate cell phones into their analyses. And the election showed traditional polling outfits did a pretty good job of predicting this one.

I'd also be careful about confusing interest with action. As others noted, this race gained national attention, so I'm sure there were others like me who checked out the candidate sites but could not vote in the election.

Monday February 08, 2010

You can win just like Scott Brown (not verified) Said:

[...] map in the Massachusetts campaign’s final days. But, social media numbers tabulated by the Wordstream Internet Marketing blog turned out to be the most accurate in predicting the election’s outcome. What if you [...]

Wednesday March 10, 2010

LCD Patrick (not verified) Said:

Seems like Scott Brown has got the supportment of the internet community, but this doesnt mean he is more popular, even when its never bad to have the internet users on your side. Here in Germany the most popular party in the internet (~40 percent like them) has only got 2 percent of the votes in the october vote, so don't think this data means that much.

Friday March 19, 2010

Dave (not verified) Said:

A very good link bait example and the steps that are necessary for the bait to be succesful. I have never done any marketing for a political campaign, but I have the opportunity to do so for the upcoming November elections and I am going to bookmark this post and think of some ideas. Larry, thanks for the insight

Leave a Comment

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.
 
Free Keyword Tool

Get thousands of relevent keyword suggestions - more,
faster, free!

Free Keyword Niche Finder

Discover profitable pockets of keywords for your
business.

Free Negative Keyword Suggestion Tool

Identify wasted spend before it happens and increase
your paid search ROI.

Contact Us | Company | Support | Site Map | Trademarks | Privacy Policy © 2007-2014 WordStream, Inc. All rights reserved.