SEO Marketing

Is SEO Dead? Nope, It Has Just Come Full Circle!

February 10, 2010 Posted In: SEO Marketing Comments: 4

Do I think the days of easy manipulation via links are gone? You betcha! Do I think SEO will require more "marketing" knowledge, not link algo manipulation? Oh Yeah!! On that point I'm of the opinion that third-generation SEO ("the blogging linkerati") is dead; "on-page" algos are still important because they are tied to query relevance, and unwanted manipulation using text makes it easier for search engines to determine intent.

I have never believed linking is SEO; that's a 3G SEO strategy and I knew it wasn't a long-term SEO technique, because it was out of the "complete control" of the webmaster/marketer. I have always instinctively known this technique could not be useful for ranking for the very long term unless the link is one-way and not paid for or schemed, i.e., not open to manipulation. Directory, press release, and article marketing links are also seemingly gaining "suspect" authority or at the very least closer scrutiny by Google.

I dislike the term, but think linkbait! Linkbait is just old-school Internet marketing with a new name. I tried to be "scientific" and called it reactive linking (notice when I wrote that it was placed in the "promotion" section of the site) way back in the day. Old-school SEO's used to include finding these linkbait opportunities in our competition market research. Not "SERP" competition, but rather, real competitor analysis, which is researching what content is on competitor sites.

Build a Better SEO Mouse Trap

  • Here was a time when there were no keyword tools, so you looked at sites and figured out the content priorities and tried to build a better mousetrap. We're back to that now. What users want is key again, not, what some SE thinks is important.

Personally I review user tools, interactive elements of the site and types of information and topics. How the site is optimized, IMO, has little value -- you're just following the herd (as the great Jim Wilson dubbed them, "the unwashed masses"). If you're fairly new to SEO and you're researching techniques like internal link architecture and anchor text then do that analysis; I personally don't get a lot of value from it, but that might just be my style.

The tools I am interested in getting better acquainted with are Google Trends and Insights. Behavioral targeting is looking like it will be the "keyword research" tool for social media content targeting.

  • IMO, that's where the real marketing starts for webmasters! Finding that niche that's unmet or can be improved on. Distinguishing the site from the thousands of other sites out there selling widgets. Strive to be number one, not appear to be number one.

Keyword research is part of this and SERP analysis is part of it, but only to find who is at the top of the SERP and therefore determine what information/tools got them there and in the end are responsible for the success of the site. (BTW, increasingly the top positions are less useful for this type of analysis, because often sites only seem to be there because they promote themselves via link strategies. Often I find the gems much deeper in the SERPs.

  • That is until universal search came along with its "content positions" determined by user wants, i.e., videos, reference/resource, images, news/RTS, doubles (e.g., news and a pic in separate listings) and combos (e.g. paid inclusion and pics together) and of course the Gorg's need to sell ads.

SEO Times Are Changing

The Age of the Digital Asset Manager

Why bother with link analysis that is susceptible to "unwanted" manipulation when Google can use the analytics and user behavior from paid search; cookies, toolbars and URL shorteners from users; the billions of DoubleClick banner impressions and SERP click analysis from personalized search? IMO, linkage is another of the chapters you can remove from the SEO textbook, or as I call it, Cookie Cutter SEO. I also call it stupid 3G SEO tricks, but the reason for that is best left unsaid! ;-)

Website positioning isn't what you think. It has less to do with SERP positions and is all about positioning for visibility in all the different, for lack of a better word, search sales verticals. PPC, comparison/shopping engines, coupon marketing, local search, personalized search and, of course, my new favorite, "Web 2.0" social community sites.

See, that's how we came full circle. The changes and signals of personal, Caffeine and universal search have brought us back to webmaster skills and the ability to market playing a bigger role than link building and anchor text manipulation.

Sure, links are still a signal but it is evident that search engines believe links are too noisy and susceptible to unwanted manipulation.

Terry Van Horne is the founder of SeoPros and a 15-year veteran of Web development.

AdWords Performance Grader




If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment.

Comments

Wednesday February 10, 2010

Alan Bleiweiss (not verified) Said:

wait.

you mean marketing is an important part of Internet Marketing again? How odd. How completely and totally shocking. It's truly sad then that all I've ever done is focus on the marketing aspects of my work. Truly sad indeed. All those hours not wasted. Oh my.

Wednesday February 10, 2010

SEO – seo pack | Know Marketing Blog (not verified) Said:

[...] Is SEO Dead? Nope, It Has Just Come Full Circle! | WordStream9 hours ago SEO isn't dead, but links are losing their power as a search engine signal because they are too easy to manipulate. [...]

Friday February 12, 2010

Nick @ Brick Marketing (not verified) Said:

AMEN to this post!

As a marketer and SEO professional, I have too have seen the 360 shift from SEO as a technical medium to more of a marketing approach.

Here is a recent blog post that I wrote that has some key points that tie into this post:
http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/01/26/marketing-tech...

Monday February 15, 2010

John (not verified) Said:

Third Generation SEO which is mainly based on finding "link" has been there due to Google algo and unless and until Google changes its basic algo from link-based to behavioral-based. Links will always remain one of the several job that SEOs has to perform for a successful campaing
Of-course when you consider 'SERP' position as less important - then it is totally a different matter.
But still when I look around the webmaster world (meaning the webmasters & SEO industry)--- and also have a look at my Analytics account, I see almost all gets majority of their traffic from Search Engines (SERP). I myself get 62% from organic results.
So, its not just positioning for visibility but also SEs must love sites and SEO's will always try to optimize sites based on the Algo a particular SE has.

 
Free Keyword Tool

Get thousands of relevent keyword suggestions - more,
faster, free!

Free Keyword Niche Finder

Discover profitable pockets of keywords for your
business.

Free Negative Keyword Suggestion Tool

Identify wasted spend before it happens and increase
your paid search ROI.

Contact Us | Company | Support | Site Map | Trademarks | Privacy Policy © 2007-2014 WordStream, Inc. All rights reserved.