How do you feel about private data in public spaces? Search Plus Your World  was disturbing enough. If I do a Google image search for “ice cream,” it’s because I want some generic pictures of ice cream. I don’t want to find a picture of myself eating ice cream. I especially don’t want to find a picture of myself eating ice cream naked. (I don’t have any nude photos in my Picasa account, that I know of, but it’s possible right?) And I especially don’t want a friend who is using my computer to find a picture of me eating ice cream naked. And if I’m borrowing a friend’s computer, I don’t want to find their naked pictures either! (I don’t know any male models.)
And now Google has officially gone completely crazy. Yesterday they announced that search results will soon incorporate information from your Gmail account :
Sometimes the best answer to your question isn’t available on the public web—it may be contained somewhere else, such as in your email. We think you shouldn’t have to be your own mini-search engine to find the most useful information—it should just work. A search is a search, and we want our results to be truly universal.
Currently (thank god), this is an opt-in trial.
Does anyone want this?
My immediate reaction to this announcement is no, no, no, no, no. Google has become the king of fixing what isn’t broken – Search in Gmail works fine. If I want to find something in my Gmail account, I search my Gmail account. There is no reason to try to get that information from Google.com.
Again, this opens up huge security holes. What if I check my email on someone else’s computer (or, worse, a public computer) and forget to sign out? Then the next person who uses Google on that computer can potentially find private data from my email account in their search results? What’s next – Google Banking? Link your Google+ account to your bank account, share your statements with your circles, it’s all so much easier, it just works!
Need I mention that the Gmail  results will occupy that same no-man’s-land to the right of the organic search results where Google is putting the Knowledge Graph? I still think my eye-training conspiracy theory  holds water.
Opt-in or no, there have been some negative reactions. See this HackerNews thread  – lots of concerns about security and the mixing of private and public info.
Martin Brinkmann of Ghacks calls it “nonsense ” and says “there are too many ifs for too little benefit right now.”
Danny Sullivan gave the new feature a field test  and wrote about his experience. He defends the feature from a privacy perspective:
No one is automatically added to this program. In addition, it’s super important to understand that if you do enter the program, you are not exposing your email in search results to the entire world. Only you, when signed-in to your Google Account, will see any matching Gmail messages mixed with your search results.
But until Google uses fingerprint or retina scanning to make sure “only I” can see the results, I remain suspicious. People forget to sign out of their accounts all the time.
Would you use a feature like this?
More Web Marketing Highlights
Mashable makes my non-Facebooking self a little nervous by saying employers see people who aren’t on “the network” as crazy  or dangerous liabilities. Yipes!
Ken Krogue, in “The Death of SEO Part 2,” lists 14 approaches to creating “real” content .
Ian Lurie has made some stupid blogging mistakes  – luckily, he’s learned something from them!
Oli at Unbounce puts 25 landing pages through the ringer and explains how he would make them better .
Also, check out the continued discussion on Larry's recent posts on why SEO's "suck at PPC"  and why he doesn't believe that SEO value lasts forever . There's some great stuff in the comments.
Have a good weekend, folks.