“But how can I steal my competitor’s customers?”
This is a common request I hear from business owners, whether they’ve been running Google Ads for years or they’re setting up their first campaign. How can you “crush the competition” with your Google Ads strategy?
Sometimes, this request is rooted in a good old-fashioned competitive spirit. Sometimes, it’s because the competitor is already advertising on your brand name, so you want to retaliate. Whatever the reason, we’re going to explore what “traditional” competitive conquesting is in Google Search. Then, I’ll share three different competitive conquesting strategies that you can try today–without breaking the bank.
The dictionary definition of “conquesting” is “the act of taking control of a place or people by using force.” Sounds a bit extreme for a digital marketing strategy, right? In Google Ads, competitive conquesting refers to the tactic of placing ads on searches for your competitors.
For example, let’s say you are Anthropic (makers of the popular Claude LLM). If you were to use [claude] as a keyword in your Search campaign, that would be a branded search strategy. If you were to use [chatgpt] as a keyword in your Search campaign, that would be competitor conquesting.
Here’s an example in the wild. A search for The Farmer’s Dog yields results for other businesses clearly targeting their brand keyword.

🛑 Before you try to overtake the competition–get a real read on how your Google Ads are performing right now. Find out with a free, instant audit: Google Ads Performance Grader >>
Competitive conquesting typically comes with a double whammy of high CPCs and low conversion rates, which means poor ROI. Why?
First, when a user is searching for a competitor, that means they already know exactly what they’re looking for. So even if they do click on your ad, many will bounce once they realize that you are Claude, not ChatGPT. That leads to poor conversion rates.
Second, while you can use your competitor’s name as a keyword, you can’t always put their name in your ad copy. While most practitioners focus on the potential trademark issues involved with putting another brand’s name in your ad copy, the more pressing Google Ads policy is actually “Unacceptable business practices.”

Other Farm Fresh Box? I see what you did there.
To quote Google’s Advertising policies about Misrepresentation, one of the unacceptable business practices (that can lead to account suspension, if not remedied) is “Impersonating other brands or businesses in your ads or on your website to hide your identity or imply connections or qualifications.”
In plain English, you can’t pretend to be another brand. For example, Marcus Bawden, Managing Director at T-mex Express, recently posted a screenshot on LinkedIn of a competitor using the ad headline “T-mex”

See Marcus’s full post here.
Regardless of trademark usage, and regardless of consumer protection laws in the UK (where Marcus is based), this other company was violating Google Ads policy because the headline implies that they are T-mex, when they are not. Don’t do this!
And because you aren’t doing this, you will usually have a low CTR if you advertise on your competitor’s name, which means poor ad quality, and therefore high CPCs. This is the other reason that search conquesting is usually prohibitively expensive.
🚨 Want to know what CPCs your competitors are seeing in Google Ads? Download our latest Google Ads Benchmarks to find out!
So what’s a savvy Google Ads advertisers do instead of true competitive conquesting? Here are three options that I developed for you to help you see better results than a conquesting campaign would net you.
Instead of paying a premium to show an ad at the exact moment a user searches for a competitor, you can show ads to people who have recently searched for your competitor–as they’re doing other things online. This strategy is cost effective (since you don’t have the poor ad quality/high CPC issue), and allows you to proactively get in front of people searching for the competition.
While you can’t pretend to be your competitor, you can absolutely draw fair comparisons between your offerings and theirs. To clarify, it is acceptable within Google’s policies to use a headline like “Claude vs. ChatGPT” because you are not pretending to be ChatGPT, so you are not misrepresenting your business.
While laws vary by region, it is also acceptable by many consumer protection agencies to compare yourself to the competition. As always, this is not legal advice; consult with a lawyer before launching any type of competitive strategy.
Assuming that your legal department gives you the “okay,” you’re going to start running comparison search ads rather than competitor conquesting ads. What’s the difference?
Competitor conquesting is advertising on searches for “chatgpt” with ad copy that says “Try Claude today” or “Top AI Chatbot Claude.” Competitor keyword with no competitor name in the ad copy.
Comparison search ads are when you advertise on searches for “chatgpt vs. claude” with ad copy that says “ChatGPT vs. Claude: Which one?” or “Choose Claude vs. ChatGPT.” Comparison keywords with matching comparison ad copy. See the difference? You’re positioning yourself in front of users who are actively comparing you to your competitor.

This is an organic result, but Microsoft could run it as a comparison ad and be in the clear.
Rather than serving a regular branded ad, or a regular competitor ad, create a hybrid ad group (or campaign) to specifically serve these comparison searches.
I tested this strategy with one of my coaching clients, who runs a subscription software business. After reviewing the search terms together, I advised them to add comparison keywords and comparison ad copy to their existing competitor conquesting campaign. The results? 8% higher ROAS (and 7% lower CPA) from comparison keywords vs. competitor keywords.
Here is how the key metrics landed over the last year for comparison keywords (for example, [chatgpt or claude]) vs. competitor keywords (for example, [claude]):
Instead of fighting over your competitor’s brand name, why not steal the non-brand searches that are driving traffic to their website?
I coined the name “non-brand conquesting” for this strategy, because you are specifically conquesting your competitor’s non-brand traffic, rather than their brand traffic. In doing so, you don’t have the low CVR/high CPC issues that plague standard competitor conquesting–and you’re not risking any policy or legal violations.
You can also use the WordStream Free Keyword Tool for this!
These competitive conquesting alternatives allow you to spend less while still targeting your competitors’ customers. Try these out and see which works best to steal your competitors’ traffic.
For more help conquering Google Ads, reach out to see how we can help.